To expose context flags through diagnostic endpoint
`/debug/metrics/flags`.
The current `/debug/metrics/cmdline` only provides the command run by
user. In the case when user runs Erigon using config file, `cmdline`’s
info does not truly reflect the ‘launch setting' and flags set that
Erigon is running on.
## Example
### Command
```
erigon --datadir /tmp/data --config test.yaml
```
### Pseudo config file (in yaml)
```
datadir : '/tmp/data'
chain : "sepolia"
http : true
metrics: true
private.api.addr : "localhost:9090"
http.api : ["eth","debug","net"]
```
### Output
```
SUCCESS
chain=sepolia
config=test.yaml
datadir=/tmp/data
http=true
http.api=eth,debug,net
metrics=true
private.api.addr=localhost:9090
```
Transaction extension to support BlobTxWrapper (or network
representation of BlobTx). BlobTxWrapper wraps BlobTx with additional
data: blobs, commitments and proofs. Unwrap() returns unwrapped tx if
its network tx, otherwise returns itself.
This addresses the last known deficiency of the eth_getProof
implementation. The previous code would return an error in the event
that the element was not found in the trie. EIP-1186 allows for
'negative' proofs where a proof demonstrates that an element cannot be
in the trie, so this commit updates the logic to support that case.
Co-authored-by: Jason Yellick <jason@enya.ai>
This PR extends the function merged in #7337 to cover the proof
generation paths as well.
The first commit simply migrates the internal proof checking code from
the rpc `eth_getProof` test to be available externally exported under
`turbo/trie`. In the process, it translates the in place testing
assertions to return more normally as errors and adapts to use the
pre-existing trie node types which are defined slightly differently
(although this code is still intended only for testing purposes).
The second commit refactors the existing trie fuzzing tests from the
previous PR and adds new fuzzing tests for the proof generation. In
order to validate the proofs, these fuzzing tests fundamentally do two
things. Firstly, after bootstrapping the test (by seeding, and modifying
the db), for each key we compute the 'naive' proof utilizing the
existing code in `proof.go` and the in memory `trie.Trie` structure. The
`trie.Trie` code actually had a couple small bugs which are fixed in
this PR (not handling value nodes, and not honoring the `NewTestRLPTrie`
contract of pre-RLP encoded nodes in proof generation). Secondly, we
re-compute the same proof for the flatDB production variant, and verify
that it is exactly the same proof as computed by the naive
implementation.
This fuzzing has been run for ~72 hours locally with no errors. Although
this code hasn't identified any new bugs in the proof generation path,
it improves coverage and should help to prevent regressions. Additional
extensions will be provided in a subsequent PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Yellick <jason@enya.ai>
types.NewMessage now expects maxFeePerDataGas param, which will be used
in transaction verification (preCheck). GetPayloadV3 method added to
EngineAPI. Some cosmetic changes applied.
**Problem**
While tracing the block with Parity tracer(`trace_block`) it returns
error for a few blocks.
<details><summary>Example of blocks that couldn't be traced</summary>
These are the example of payloads with the errors occured during tracing
the blocks:
1. `{"method":"trace_block","params":["0x24165bd"],"id":0}` - `first run
for txIndex 32 error: insufficient funds for gas * price + value:
address 0x000005D814d5abD6e0F9345c9b1f37C82Eaf1EBb have
547961731687102852 want 675024999764675175`
2. `{"method":"trace_block","params":["0x2658753"],"id":0}` - `first run
for txIndex 45 error: insufficient funds for gas * price + value:
address 0x000004BeDC012a5D043270AF67de24c20a3b8aeB have
211658993830905595 want 235579381558610848`
3. `{"method":"trace_block","params":["0x258b00c"],"id":0} -first run
for txIndex 274 error: insufficient funds for gas * price + value:
address 0xA3a762006D22806B35895f4C0599bAe3adF1B349 have
342048586356638524 want 386865441635818752`
</details>
After looking through the
[trace_filtering.go](https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/devel/cmd/rpcdaemon/commands/trace_filtering.go#L1006)
and
[trace_adhoc.go](https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/devel/cmd/rpcdaemon/commands/trace_adhoc.go#L1072)
noticed that `doCallMany` called with `gasBailOut = true` in
[one](https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/devel/cmd/rpcdaemon/commands/trace_adhoc.go#L1072)
place and `gasBailOut = false` in
[another](https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/devel/cmd/rpcdaemon/commands/trace_filtering.go#L1006)
(actually the part of the code that is called by `trace_block`.
Changing its value to `true` fixed the problem and traces are successful
with this change.
Attaching the partial result of the successful trace below.
<details><summary>{"method":"trace_block","params":["0x24165bd"],"id":0}</summary>
```json
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 0,
"result": [
{
"action": {
"from": "0x3eaf7de168a79c1d6a1aab8c106e42b6f4e0a7c8",
"callType": "call",
"gas": "0x30464",
"input": "0x0000000100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001dcbde73f0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002086b35cd47c9189dc02791bca1f2de4661ed88a30c99a7a9449aa841740d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf12700001f4000000000000000000000f490d8e000000000000",
"to": "0x1d36f9688cceafee9d7df45fe8e24884ed0d6730",
"value": "0x0"
},
"blockHash": "0x96f0792349a67b7995dda853df79bd5fa9d2926eb2ac8a07ac46e4df429632af",
"blockNumber": 37840317,
"error": "Reverted",
"result": {
"gasUsed": "0x1d2d",
"output": "0x08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000056572723332000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
},
"subtraces": 1,
"traceAddress": [],
"transactionHash": "0x1417cab7ae635884117909cc828474df0121d4a2a0ad033f462e6fa84bfab176",
"transactionPosition": 0,
"type": "call"
},
{
"action": {
"from": "0x1d36f9688cceafee9d7df45fe8e24884ed0d6730",
"callType": "staticcall",
"gas": "0x2e9b7",
"input": "0x3850c7bd",
"to": "0xa374094527e1673a86de625aa59517c5de346d32",
"value": "0x0"
},
"blockHash": "0x96f0792349a67b7995dda853df79bd5fa9d2926eb2ac8a07ac46e4df429632af",
"blockNumber": 37840317,
"result": {
"gasUsed": "0xa88",
"output": "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f49c33e3991750050fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbc158000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000096d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009c400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000009c400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001"
},
"subtraces": 0,
"traceAddress": [
0
],
.....
},
"blockHash": "0x96f0792349a67b7995dda853df79bd5fa9d2926eb2ac8a07ac46e4df429632af",
"blockNumber": 37840317,
"result": null,
"subtraces": 0,
"traceAddress": [],
"type": "reward"
}
]
}
```
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: alexqrid <>
According to EIP-1186 the `proof` parts of the response to eth_getProof
should be returned "starting with the stateRoot-Node, following the path
of the SHA3 (address) as key." Currently, the proof is returned in
traversal order, rather than from the root.
Although all of the proof elements are there and correct, this is
contrary to the EIP and will cause problems for some clients. The
existing rpc test uses a map to lookup proof elements by hash, rather
than by index, so this bug was not initially caught.
This commit fixes the behavior, updates the existing test, and adds
additional checks to the rpc test.
Co-authored-by: Jason Yellick <jason@enya.ai>
`excessDataGas` has been partially made eip-4844 ready, so instead of
passing nils to functions, now it actually assigned to some value (it is
expected to be nil until cancun update).
when assigning default bor parameters, need to make sure config exists
first. since not sending the config will result in it being nil, not the
empty struct.
it would appear that an extra `e` was added somewhere along the way to
the cli flags for txpool. If this was intentional I was curious as to
why, otherwise it seems like fixing the flag would remedy some
confusion. Thank you
Upon further investigation it would appear
https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/devel/cmd/utils/flags.go#L173
shows corrected spelling.
