Commit Graph

2164 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Sproul
918b688f72
Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning (#3976)
* Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning

* Fix self limiter
2023-02-15 14:17:56 +11:00
Michael Sproul
f7bd4bf06e
Update block rewards API for Capella 2023-02-14 12:09:40 +11:00
Michael Sproul
d53ccf8fc7
Placeholder for BlobsByRange outbound rate limit 2023-02-14 12:08:14 +11:00
Michael Sproul
18c8cab4da
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-merge 2023-02-14 12:07:27 +11:00
Michael Sproul
2f456ff9eb Fix regression in DB write atomicity (#3931)
## Issue Addressed

Fix a bug introduced by #3696. The bug is not expected to occur frequently, so releasing this PR is non-urgent.

## Proposed Changes

* Add a variant to `StoreOp` that allows a raw KV operation to be passed around.
* Return to using `self.store.do_atomically` rather than `self.store.hot_db.do_atomically`. This streamlines the write back into a single call and makes our auto-revert work again.
* Prevent `import_block_update_shuffling_cache` from failing block import. This is an outstanding bug from before v3.4.0 which may have contributed to some random unexplained database corruption.

## Additional Info

In #3696 I split the database write into two calls, one to convert the `StoreOp`s to `KeyValueStoreOp`s and one to write them. This had the unfortunate side-effect of damaging our atomicity guarantees in case of a write error. If the first call failed, we would be left with the block in fork choice but not on-disk (or the snapshot cache), which would prevent us from processing any descendant blocks. On `unstable` the first call is very unlikely to fail unless the disk is full, but on `tree-states` the conversion is more involved and a user reported database corruption after it failed in a way that should have been recoverable.

Additionally, as @emhane observed, #3696 also inadvertently removed the import of the new block into the block cache. Although this seems like it could have negatively impacted performance, there are several mitigating factors:

- For regular block processing we should almost always load the parent block (and state) from the snapshot cache.
- We often load blinded blocks, which bypass the block cache anyway.
- Metrics show no noticeable increase in the block cache miss rate with v3.4.0.

However, I expect the block cache _will_ be useful again in `tree-states`, so it is restored to use by this PR.
2023-02-13 03:32:01 +00:00
Paul Hauner
84843d67d7 Reduce some EE and builder related ERRO logs to WARN (#3966)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Our `ERRO` stream has been rather noisy since the merge due to some unexpected behaviours of builders and EEs. Now that we've been running post-merge for a while, I think we can drop some of these `ERRO` to `WARN` so we're not "crying wolf".

The modified logs are:

#### `ERRO Execution engine call failed`

I'm seeing this quite frequently on Geth nodes. They seem to timeout when they're busy and it rarely indicates a serious issue. We also have logging across block import, fork choice updating and payload production that raise `ERRO` or `CRIT` when the EE times out, so I think we're not at risk of silencing actual issues.

#### `ERRO "Builder failed to reveal payload"`

In #3775 we reduced this log from `CRIT` to `ERRO` since it's common for builders to fail to reveal the block to the producer directly whilst still broadcasting it to the networ. I think it's worth dropping this to `WARN` since it's rarely interesting.

I elected to stay with `WARN` since I really do wish builders would fulfill their API promises by returning the block to us. Perhaps I'm just being pedantic here, I could be convinced otherwise.

#### `ERRO "Relay error when registering validator(s)"`

It seems like builders and/or mev-boost struggle to handle heavy loads of validator registrations. I haven't observed issues with validators not actually being registered, but I see timeouts on these endpoints many times a day. It doesn't seem like this `ERRO` is worth it.

#### `ERRO Error fetching block for peer     ExecutionLayerErrorPayloadReconstruction`

This means we failed to respond to a peer on the P2P network with a block they requested because of an error in the `execution_layer`. It's very common to see timeouts or incomplete responses on this endpoint whilst the EE is busy and I don't think it's important enough for an `ERRO`. As long as the peer count stays high, I don't think the user needs to be actively concerned about how we're responding to peers.

## Additional Info

NA
2023-02-12 23:14:08 +00:00
ethDreamer
e743d75c9b
Update Mock Builder for Post-Capella Tests (#3958)
* Update Mock Builder for Post-Capella Tests

* Add _mut Suffix to BidStuff Functions

* Fix Setting Gas Limit
2023-02-10 13:30:14 -06:00
ethDreamer
39f8327f73
Properly Deserialize ForkVersionedResponses (#3944)
* Move ForkVersionedResponse to consensus/types

* Properly Deserialize ForkVersionedResponses

* Elide Types in from_value Calls

* Added Tests for ForkVersionedResponse Deserialize

* Address Sean's Comments & Make Less Restrictive

* Utilize `map_fork_name!`
2023-02-10 08:49:25 -06:00
Michael Sproul
c9354a9d25 Tweaks to reward APIs (#3957)
## Proposed Changes

* Return the effective balance in gwei to align with the spec ([ideal attestation rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards/getAttestationsRewards)).
* Use quoted `i64`s for attestation and sync committee rewards.
2023-02-10 06:19:42 +00:00
Paul Hauner
5276dd0cb0 Fix edge-case when finding the finalized descendant (#3924)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Description

We were missing an edge case when checking to see if a block is a descendant of the finalized checkpoint. This edge case is described for one of the tests in this PR:

a119edc739/consensus/proto_array/src/proto_array_fork_choice.rs (L1018-L1047)

This bug presented itself in the following mainnet log:

```
Jan 26 15:12:42.841 ERRO Unable to validate attestation error: MissingBeaconState(0x7c30cb80ec3d4ec624133abfa70e4c6cfecfca456bfbbbff3393e14e5b20bf25), peer_id: 16Uiu2HAm8RPRciXJYtYc5c3qtCRdrZwkHn2BXN3XP1nSi1gxHYit, type: "unaggregated", slot: Slot(5660161), beacon_block_root: 0x4a45e59da7cb9487f4836c83bdd1b741b4f31c67010c7ae343fa6771b3330489
```

Here the BN is rejecting an attestation because of a "missing beacon state". Whilst it was correct to reject the attestation, it should have rejected it because it attests to a block that conflicts with finality rather than claiming that the database is inconsistent.

The block that this attestation points to (`0x4a45`) is block `C` in the above diagram. It is a non-canonical block in the first slot of an epoch that conflicts with the finalized checkpoint. Due to our lazy pruning of proto array, `0x4a45` was still present in proto-array. Our missed edge-case in [`ForkChoice::is_descendant_of_finalized`](38514c07f2/consensus/fork_choice/src/fork_choice.rs (L1375-L1379)) would have indicated to us that the block is a descendant of the finalized block. Therefore, we would have accepted the attestation thinking that it attests to a descendant of the finalized *checkpoint*.

Since we didn't have the shuffling for this erroneously processed block, we attempted to read its state from the database. This failed because we prune states from the database by keeping track of the tips of the chain and iterating back until we find a finalized block. This would have deleted `C` from the database, hence the `MissingBeaconState` error.
2023-02-09 23:51:18 +00:00
Divma
ceb986549d Self rate limiting dev flag (#3928)
## Issue Addressed
Adds self rate limiting options, mainly with the idea to comply with peer's rate limits in small testnets

## Proposed Changes
Add a hidden flag `self-limiter` this can take no value, or customs values to configure quotas per protocol

## Additional Info
### How to use
`--self-limiter` will turn on the self rate limiter applying the same params we apply to inbound requests (requests from other peers)
`--self-limiter "beacon_blocks_by_range:64/1"` will turn on the self rate limiter for ALL protocols, but change the quota for bbrange to 64 requested blocks per 1 second.
`--self-limiter "beacon_blocks_by_range:64/1;ping:1/10"` same as previous one, changing the quota for ping as well.

### Caveats
- The rate limiter is either on or off for all protocols. I added the custom values to be able to change the quotas per protocol so that some protocols can be given extremely loose or tight quotas. I think this should satisfy every need even if we can't technically turn off rate limits per protocol.
- This reuses the rate limiter struct for the inbound requests so there is this ugly part of the code in which we need to deal with the inbound only protocols (light client stuff) if this becomes too ugly as we add lc protocols, we might want to split the rate limiters. I've checked this and looks doable with const generics to avoid so much code duplication

### Knowing if this is on
```
Feb 06 21:12:05.493 DEBG Using self rate limiting params         config: OutboundRateLimiterConfig { ping: 2/10s, metadata: 1/15s, status: 5/15s, goodbye: 1/10s, blocks_by_range: 1024/10s, blocks_by_root: 128/10s }, service: libp2p_rpc, service: libp2p
```
2023-02-08 02:18:53 +00:00
naviechan
9547ac069c Implement block_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3907)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/blocks/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": {
    "proposer_index": "123",
    "total": "123",
    "attestations": "123",
    "sync_aggregate": "123",
    "proposer_slashings": "123",
    "attester_slashings": "123"
  }
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `block_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 08:33:23 +00:00
Paul Hauner
e062a7cf76
Broadcast address changes at Capella (#3919)
* Add first efforts at broadcast

* Tidy

* Move broadcast code to client

* Progress with broadcast impl

* Rename to address change

* Fix compile errors

* Use `while` loop

* Tidy

* Flip broadcast condition

* Switch to forgetting individual indices

* Always broadcast when the node starts

* Refactor into two functions

* Add testing

* Add another test

* Tidy, add more testing

* Tidy

* Add test, rename enum

* Rename enum again

* Tidy

* Break loop early

* Add V15 schema migration

* Bump schema version

* Progress with migration

* Update beacon_node/client/src/address_change_broadcast.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Fix typo in function name

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 17:13:49 +11:00
kevinbogner
4d07e40501 Implement attestation_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3822)
## Issue Addressed

#3661 

## Proposed Changes
`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

```json
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "ideal_rewards": [
        {
          "effective_balance": "1000000000",
          "head": "2500",
          "target": "5000",
          "source": "5000"
        }
      ],
      "total_rewards": [
        {
          "validator_index": "0",
          "head": "2000",
          "target": "2000",
          "source": "4000",
          "inclusion_delay": "2000"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
- [`sync_committee_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3790)
- `attestation_rewards`
- `block_rewards`.

This PR *only* implements the `attestation_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards

## Additional Info
The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

---
- [x] `get_state`
- [x] Calculate *ideal rewards* with some logic from  `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Calculate *actual rewards*  with some logic from `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Code cleanup
- [x] Testing
2023-02-07 00:00:19 +00:00
ethDreamer
5b398b1990
Don't Reject all Builder Bids After Capella (#3940)
* Fix bug in Builder API Post-Capella

* Fix Clippy Complaints
2023-02-06 13:09:13 +11:00
ethDreamer
90b6ae62e6
Use Local Payload if More Profitable than Builder (#3934)
* Use Local Payload if More Profitable than Builder

* Rename clone -> clone_from_ref

* Minimize Clones of GetPayloadResponse

* Cleanup & Fix Tests

* Added Tests for Payload Choice by Profit

* Fix Outdated Comments
2023-02-01 19:37:46 -06:00
Mark Mackey
d842215a44
Merge branch 'upstream/unstable' into capella 2023-01-31 12:16:26 -06:00
ethDreamer
7b7595347d
exchangeCapabilities & Capella Readiness Logging (#3918)
* Undo Passing Spec to Engine API

* Utilize engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Add Logging to Indicate Capella Readiness

* Add exchangeCapabilities to mock_execution_layer

* Send Nested Array for engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Use Mutex Instead of RwLock for EngineCapabilities

* Improve Locking to Avoid Deadlock

* Prettier logic for get_engine_capabilities

* Improve Comments

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/client/src/notifier.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Addressed Michael's Comments

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 18:26:23 +01:00
Michael Sproul
0866b739d0 Clippy 1.67 (#3916)
## Proposed Changes

Clippy 1.67.0 put us on blast for the size of some of our errors, most of them written by me ( 👀 ). This PR shrinks the size of `BeaconChainError` by dropping some extraneous info and boxing an inner error which should only occur infrequently anyway.

For the `AttestationSlashInfo` and `BlockSlashInfo` I opted to ignore the lint as they are always used in a `Result<A, Info>` where `A` is a similar size. This means they don't bloat the size of the `Result`, so it's a bit annoying for Clippy to report this as an issue.

I also chose to ignore `clippy::uninlined-format-args` because I think the benefit-to-churn ratio is too low. E.g. sometimes we have long identifiers in `format!` args and IMO the non-inlined form is easier to read:

```rust
// I prefer this...
format!(
    "{} did {} to {}",
    REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    regular_long_identifier_name
);
  
// To this
format!("{REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} did {ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} to {regular_long_identifier_name}");
```

I tried generating an automatic diff with `cargo clippy --fix` but it came out at:

```
250 files changed, 1209 insertions(+), 1469 deletions(-)
```

Which seems like a bad idea when we'd have to back-merge it to `capella` and `eip4844` 😱
2023-01-27 09:48:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
16bdb2771b
Update another test broken by the shuffling change 2023-01-25 16:18:00 +11:00
Michael Sproul
e48487db01
Fix the new BLS to execution change test 2023-01-25 15:47:07 +11:00
Michael Sproul
79a20e8a5f
Update sync rewards API for abstract exec payload 2023-01-25 15:46:47 +11:00
Michael Sproul
c76a1971cc
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella 2023-01-25 14:20:16 +11:00
GeemoCandama
a7351c00c0 light client optimistic update reprocessing (#3799)
## Issue Addressed
Currently there is a race between receiving blocks and receiving light client optimistic updates (in unstable), which results in processing errors. This is a continuation of PR #3693 and seeks to progress on issue #3651

## Proposed Changes

Add the parent_root to ReprocessQueueMessage::BlockImported so we can remove blocks from queue when a block arrives that has the same parent root. We use the parent root as opposed to the block_root because the LightClientOptimisticUpdate does not contain the block_root.

If light_client_optimistic_update.attested_header.canonical_root() != head_block.message().parent_root() then we queue the update. Otherwise we process immediately.
## Additional Info
michaelsproul came up with this idea.
The code was heavily based off of the attestation reprocessing.
I have not properly tested this to see if it works as intended.
2023-01-24 22:17:50 +00:00
ethDreamer
3d4dd6af75
Use eth1_withdrawal_credentials in Test States (#3898)
* Use eth1_withdrawal_credential in Some Test States

* Update beacon_node/genesis/src/interop.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/genesis/src/interop.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Increase validator sizes

* Pick next sync committee message

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-01-24 16:22:51 +01:00
naviechan
2802bc9a9c Implement sync_committee_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3903)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/sync_committee/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "reward": "2000"
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `sync_committe_rewards `.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
2023-01-24 02:06:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
d8abf2fc41
Import BLS to execution changes before Capella (#3892)
* Import BLS to execution changes before Capella

* Test for BLS to execution change HTTP API

* Pack BLS to execution changes in LIFO order

* Remove unused var

* Clippy
2023-01-21 10:39:59 +11:00
Michael Sproul
bb0e99c097 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella 2023-01-21 10:37:26 +11:00
Age Manning
f8a3b3b95a Improve block delay metrics (#3894)
We recently ran a large-block experiment on the testnet and plan to do a further experiment on mainnet.

Although the metrics recovered from lighthouse nodes were quite useful, I think we could do with greater resolution in the block delay metrics and get some specific values for each block (currently these can be lost to large exponential histogram buckets). 

This PR increases the resolution of the block delay histogram buckets, but also introduces a new metric which records the last block delay. Depending on the polling resolution of the metric server, we can lose some block delay information, however it will always give us a specific value and we will not lose exact data based on poor resolution histogram buckets.
2023-01-20 00:46:56 +00:00
ethDreamer
26787412cd
Update engine_api to Latest spec (#3893)
* Update engine_api to Latest spec

* Small Test Fix

* Fix Test Deserialization Issue
2023-01-19 22:42:17 +11:00
Santiago Medina
912ea2a5ca Return HTTP 404 rather than 405 (#3836)
## Issue Addressed

Issue #3112

## Proposed Changes

Add `Filter::recover` to the GET chain to handle rejections specifically as 404 NOT FOUND

## Additional Info

Making a request to `http://localhost:5052/not_real` now returns the following:

```
{
    "code": 404,
    "message": "NOT_FOUND",
    "stacktraces": []
}
```


Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-01-16 03:42:09 +00:00
ethDreamer
51088725fb
CL-EL withdrawals harmonization using Gwei units (#3884) 2023-01-16 12:03:42 +11:00
realbigsean
48a8cbbc45
Merge pull request #3877 from michaelsproul/withdrawals-block-hash
Verify blockHash with withdrawals
2023-01-13 15:12:58 -05:00
realbigsean
1319683736
Update gossip_methods.rs 2023-01-13 14:59:03 -05:00
Mark Mackey
05c1291d8a Don't Penalize Early bls_to_execution_change 2023-01-13 12:53:25 -06:00
Michael Sproul
8e2931d73b
Verify blockHash with withdrawals 2023-01-13 12:46:54 +11:00
Michael Sproul
aa896decc1 Fix some beacon_chain tests 2023-01-12 19:13:01 +11:00
Michael Sproul
2af8110529
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella
Fixing the conflicts involved patching up some of the `block_hash` verification,
the rest will be done as part of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3870
2023-01-12 16:22:00 +11:00
ethDreamer
52c1055fdc
Remove withdrawals-processing feature (#3864)
* Use spec to Determine Supported Engine APIs

* Remove `withdrawals-processing` feature

* Fixed Tests

* Missed Some Spots

* Fixed Another Test

* Stupid Clippy
2023-01-12 15:15:08 +11:00
Paul Hauner
38514c07f2 Release v3.4.0 (#3862)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Bump versions

## Additional Info

- [x] ~~Blocked on #3728, #3801~~
- [x] ~~Blocked on #3866~~
- [x] Requires additional testing
2023-01-11 03:27:08 +00:00
realbigsean
98b11bbd3f
add historical summaries (#3865)
* add historical summaries

* fix tree hash caching, disable the sanity slots test with fake crypto

* add ssz static HistoricalSummary

* only store historical summaries after capella

* Teach `UpdatePattern` about Capella

* Tidy EF tests

* Clippy

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-01-11 12:40:21 +11:00
Paul Hauner
830efdb5c2 Improve validator monitor experience for high validator counts (#3728)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Myself and others (#3678) have observed  that when running with lots of validators (e.g., 1000s) the cardinality is too much for Prometheus. I've seen Prometheus instances just grind to a halt when we turn the validator monitor on for our testnet validators (we have 10,000s of Goerli validators). Additionally, the debug log volume can get very high with one log per validator, per attestation.

To address this, the `bn --validator-monitor-individual-tracking-threshold <INTEGER>` flag has been added to *disable* per-validator (i.e., non-aggregated) metrics/logging once the validator monitor exceeds the threshold of validators. The default value is `64`, which is a finger-to-the-wind value. I don't actually know the value at which Prometheus starts to become overwhelmed, but I've seen it work with ~64 validators and I've seen it *not* work with 1000s of validators. A default of `64` seems like it will result in a breaking change to users who are running millions of dollars worth of validators whilst resulting in a no-op for low-validator-count users. I'm open to changing this number, though.

Additionally, this PR starts collecting aggregated Prometheus metrics (e.g., total count of head hits across all validators), so that high-validator-count validators still have some interesting metrics. We already had logging for aggregated values, so nothing has been added there.

I've opted to make this a breaking change since it can be rather damaging to your Prometheus instance to accidentally enable the validator monitor with large numbers of validators. I've crashed a Prometheus instance myself and had a report from another user who's done the same thing.

## Additional Info

NA

## Breaking Changes Note

A new label has been added to the validator monitor Prometheus metrics: `total`. This label tracks the aggregated metrics of all validators in the validator monitor (as opposed to each validator being tracking individually using its pubkey as the label).

Additionally, a new flag has been added to the Beacon Node: `--validator-monitor-individual-tracking-threshold`. The default value is `64`, which means that when the validator monitor is tracking more than 64 validators then it will stop tracking per-validator metrics and only track the `all_validators` metric. It will also stop logging per-validator logs and only emit aggregated logs (the exception being that exit and slashing logs are always emitted).

These changes were introduced in #3728 to address issues with untenable Prometheus cardinality and log volume when using the validator monitor with high validator counts (e.g., 1000s of validators). Users with less than 65 validators will see no change in behavior (apart from the added `all_validators` metric). Users with more than 65 validators who wish to maintain the previous behavior can set something like `--validator-monitor-individual-tracking-threshold 999999`.
2023-01-09 08:18:55 +00:00
Michael Sproul
4bd2b777ec Verify execution block hashes during finalized sync (#3794)
## Issue Addressed

Recent discussions with other client devs about optimistic sync have revealed a conceptual issue with the optimisation implemented in #3738. In designing that feature I failed to consider that the execution node checks the `blockHash` of the execution payload before responding with `SYNCING`, and that omitting this check entirely results in a degradation of the full node's validation. A node omitting the `blockHash` checks could be tricked by a supermajority of validators into following an invalid chain, something which is ordinarily impossible.

## Proposed Changes

I've added verification of the `payload.block_hash` in Lighthouse. In case of failure we log a warning and fall back to verifying the payload with the execution client.

I've used our existing dependency on `ethers_core` for RLP support, and a new dependency on Parity's `triehash` crate for the Merkle patricia trie. Although the `triehash` crate is currently unmaintained it seems like our best option at the moment (it is also used by Reth, and requires vastly less boilerplate than Parity's generic `trie-root` library).

Block hash verification is pretty quick, about 500us per block on my machine (mainnet).

The optimistic finalized sync feature can be disabled using `--disable-optimistic-finalized-sync` which forces full verification with the EL.

## Additional Info

This PR also introduces a new dependency on our [`metastruct`](https://github.com/sigp/metastruct) library, which was perfectly suited to the RLP serialization method. There will likely be changes as `metastruct` grows, but I think this is a good way to start dogfooding it.

I took inspiration from some Parity and Reth code while writing this, and have preserved the relevant license headers on the files containing code that was copied and modified.
2023-01-09 03:11:59 +00:00
ethDreamer
11f4784ae6
Added bls_to_execution_changes to PersistedOpPool (#3857)
* Added bls_to_execution_changes to PersistedOpPool
2023-01-09 12:38:02 +11:00
ethDreamer
cb94f639b0
Isolate withdrawals-processing Feature (#3854) 2023-01-09 11:05:28 +11:00
ethDreamer
6b72f45cad
Merge pull request #3845 from realbigsean/capella-cleanup
Capella cleanup
2023-01-06 13:26:41 -06:00
Age Manning
1d9a2022b4 Upgrade to libp2p v0.50.0 (#3764)
I've needed to do this work in order to do some episub testing. 

This version of libp2p has not yet been released, so this is left as a draft for when we wish to update.

Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
2023-01-06 15:59:33 +00:00
Mark Mackey
2ac609b64e Fixing Moar Failing Tests 2023-01-05 13:00:44 -06:00
Age Manning
4e5e7ee1fc Restructure code for libp2p upgrade (#3850)
Our custom RPC implementation is lagging from the libp2p v50 version. 

We are going to need to change a bunch of function names and would be nice to have consistent ordering of function names inside the handlers. 

This is a precursor to the libp2p upgrade to minimize merge conflicts in function ordering.
2023-01-05 17:18:24 +00:00
Mark Mackey
8711db2f3b Fix EF Tests 2023-01-04 15:14:43 -06:00