mirror of
https://gitlab.com/pulsechaincom/prysm-pulse.git
synced 2025-01-17 15:28:45 +00:00
490 lines
15 KiB
Go
490 lines
15 KiB
Go
|
package protoarray
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
import (
|
|||
|
"context"
|
|||
|
"fmt"
|
|||
|
"testing"
|
|||
|
"time"
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
types "github.com/prysmaticlabs/eth2-types"
|
|||
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/config/params"
|
|||
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/testing/assert"
|
|||
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/testing/require"
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Simple, ex-ante attack mitigation using proposer boost.
|
|||
|
// In a nutshell, an adversarial block proposer in slot n+1 keeps its proposal hidden.
|
|||
|
// The honest block proposer in slot n+2 will then propose an honest block. The
|
|||
|
// adversary can now use its committee members’ votes from both slots n+1 and n+2.
|
|||
|
// and release their withheld block of slot n+2 in an attempt to win fork choice.
|
|||
|
// If the honest proposal is boosted at slot n+2, it will win against this attacker.
|
|||
|
func TestForkChoice_BoostProposerRoot_PreventsExAnteAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|||
|
zeroHash := params.BeaconConfig().ZeroHash
|
|||
|
graffiti := [32]byte{}
|
|||
|
balances := make([]uint64, 64) // 64 active validators.
|
|||
|
for i := 0; i < len(balances); i++ {
|
|||
|
balances[i] = 10
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
jEpoch, fEpoch := types.Epoch(0), types.Epoch(0)
|
|||
|
t.Run("back-propagates boost score to ancestors after proposer boosting", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := setup(jEpoch, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// The head should always start at the finalized block.
|
|||
|
headRoot, err := f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, zeroHash, headRoot, "Incorrect head with genesis")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Insert block at slot 1 into the tree and verify head is at that block:
|
|||
|
// 0
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 1 <- HEAD
|
|||
|
slot := types.Slot(1)
|
|||
|
newRoot := indexToHash(1)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
slot,
|
|||
|
newRoot,
|
|||
|
headRoot,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, []uint64{0}, newRoot, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
headRoot, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, newRoot, headRoot, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 1")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Insert block at slot 2 into the tree and verify head is at that block:
|
|||
|
// 0
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 1
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 2 <- HEAD
|
|||
|
slot = types.Slot(2)
|
|||
|
newRoot = indexToHash(2)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
slot,
|
|||
|
newRoot,
|
|||
|
headRoot,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, []uint64{1}, newRoot, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
headRoot, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, newRoot, headRoot, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Insert block at slot 3 into the tree and verify head is at that block:
|
|||
|
// 0
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 1
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 2
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 3 <- HEAD
|
|||
|
slot = types.Slot(2)
|
|||
|
newRoot = indexToHash(2)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
slot,
|
|||
|
newRoot,
|
|||
|
headRoot,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, []uint64{2}, newRoot, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
headRoot, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, newRoot, headRoot, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 3")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Insert a second block at slot 3 into the tree and boost its score.
|
|||
|
// 0
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 1
|
|||
|
// |
|
|||
|
// 2
|
|||
|
// / \
|
|||
|
// 3 4 <- HEAD
|
|||
|
slot = types.Slot(3)
|
|||
|
newRoot = indexToHash(4)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
slot,
|
|||
|
newRoot,
|
|||
|
headRoot,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, []uint64{3}, newRoot, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
threeSlots := 3 * params.BeaconConfig().SecondsPerSlot
|
|||
|
genesisTime := time.Now().Add(-time.Second * time.Duration(threeSlots))
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, slot, newRoot, genesisTime))
|
|||
|
headRoot, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, newRoot, headRoot, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 3")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Check the ancestor scores from the store.
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, 4, len(f.store.nodes))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Expect nodes to have a boosted, back-propagated score.
|
|||
|
// Ancestors have the added weights of their children. Genesis is a special exception at 0 weight,
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, f.store.nodes[0].weight, uint64(0))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Otherwise assuming a block, A, that is not-genesis:
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// A -> B -> C
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
//Where each one has a weight of 10 individually, the final weights will look like
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// (A: 30) -> (B: 20) -> (C: 10)
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// The boost adds 14 to the weight, so if C is boosted, we would have
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// (A: 44) -> (B: 34) -> (C: 24)
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// In this case, we have a small fork:
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// (A: 54) -> (B: 44) -> (C: 24)
|
|||
|
// \_->(D: 10)
|
|||
|
//
|
|||
|
// So B has its own weight, 10, and the sum of of both C and D thats why we see weight 54 in the
|
|||
|
// middle instead of the normal progression of (44 -> 34 -> 24).
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, f.store.nodes[1].weight, uint64(54))
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, f.store.nodes[2].weight, uint64(44))
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, f.store.nodes[3].weight, uint64(24))
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("vanilla ex ante attack", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := setup(jEpoch, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// The head should always start at the finalized block.
|
|||
|
r, err := f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, zeroHash, r, "Incorrect head with genesis")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Proposer from slot 1 does not reveal their block, B, at slot 1.
|
|||
|
// Proposer at slot 2 does reveal their block, C, and it becomes the head.
|
|||
|
// C builds on A, as proposer at slot 1 did not reveal B.
|
|||
|
// A
|
|||
|
// / \
|
|||
|
// (B?) \
|
|||
|
// \
|
|||
|
// C <- Slot 2 HEAD
|
|||
|
honestBlockSlot := types.Slot(2)
|
|||
|
honestBlock := indexToHash(2)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
honestBlockSlot,
|
|||
|
honestBlock,
|
|||
|
zeroHash,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, honestBlock, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlockSlot := types.Slot(1)
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlock := indexToHash(1)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlockSlot,
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlock,
|
|||
|
zeroHash,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure the head is C, the honest block.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, honestBlock, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// We boost the honest proposal at slot 2.
|
|||
|
secondsPerSlot := time.Second * time.Duration(params.BeaconConfig().SecondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-2 * secondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, honestBlockSlot, honestBlock, genesis))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// The maliciously withheld block has one vote.
|
|||
|
votes := []uint64{1}
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, votes, maliciouslyWithheldBlock, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure the head is STILL C, the honest block, as the honest block had proposer boost.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, honestBlock, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("adversarial attestations > proposer boosting", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := setup(jEpoch, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// The head should always start at the finalized block.
|
|||
|
r, err := f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, zeroHash, r, "Incorrect head with genesis")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Proposer from slot 1 does not reveal their block, B, at slot 1.
|
|||
|
// Proposer at slot 2 does reveal their block, C, and it becomes the head.
|
|||
|
// C builds on A, as proposer at slot 1 did not reveal B.
|
|||
|
// A
|
|||
|
// / \
|
|||
|
// (B?) \
|
|||
|
// \
|
|||
|
// C <- Slot 2 HEAD
|
|||
|
honestBlockSlot := types.Slot(2)
|
|||
|
honestBlock := indexToHash(2)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
honestBlockSlot,
|
|||
|
honestBlock,
|
|||
|
zeroHash,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure C is the head.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, honestBlock, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlockSlot := types.Slot(1)
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlock := indexToHash(1)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlockSlot,
|
|||
|
maliciouslyWithheldBlock,
|
|||
|
zeroHash,
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure C is still the head after the malicious proposer reveals their block.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, honestBlock, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// We boost the honest proposal at slot 2.
|
|||
|
secondsPerSlot := time.Second * time.Duration(params.BeaconConfig().SecondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-2 * secondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, honestBlockSlot, honestBlock, genesis))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// An attestation is received for B that has more voting power than C with the proposer boost,
|
|||
|
// allowing B to then become the head if their attestation has enough adversarial votes.
|
|||
|
votes := []uint64{1, 2}
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, votes, maliciouslyWithheldBlock, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Expect the head to have switched to B.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, maliciouslyWithheldBlock, r, "Expected B to become the head")
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("boosting necessary to sandwich attack", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
// Boosting necessary to sandwich attack.
|
|||
|
// Objects:
|
|||
|
// Block A - slot N
|
|||
|
// Block B (parent A) - slot N+1
|
|||
|
// Block C (parent A) - slot N+2
|
|||
|
// Block D (parent B) - slot N+3
|
|||
|
// Attestation_1 (Block C); size 1 - slot N+2 (honest)
|
|||
|
// Steps:
|
|||
|
// Block A received at N — A is head
|
|||
|
// Block C received at N+2 — C is head
|
|||
|
// Block B received at N+2 — C is head
|
|||
|
// Attestation_1 received at N+3 — C is head
|
|||
|
// Block D received at N+3 — D is head
|
|||
|
f := setup(jEpoch, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
a := zeroHash
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// The head should always start at the finalized block.
|
|||
|
r, err := f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, zeroHash, r, "Incorrect head with genesis")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
cSlot := types.Slot(2)
|
|||
|
c := indexToHash(2)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
cSlot,
|
|||
|
c,
|
|||
|
a, // parent
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure C is the head.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, c, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// We boost C.
|
|||
|
secondsPerSlot := time.Second * time.Duration(params.BeaconConfig().SecondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-2 * secondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, cSlot /* slot */, c, genesis))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
bSlot := types.Slot(1)
|
|||
|
b := indexToHash(1)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
bSlot,
|
|||
|
b,
|
|||
|
a, // parent
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure C is still the head.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, c, r, "Incorrect head for justified epoch at slot 2")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// An attestation for C is received at slot N+3.
|
|||
|
votes := []uint64{1}
|
|||
|
f.ProcessAttestation(ctx, votes, c, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// A block D, building on B, is received at slot N+3. It should not be able to win without boosting.
|
|||
|
dSlot := types.Slot(3)
|
|||
|
d := indexToHash(3)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t,
|
|||
|
f.ProcessBlock(
|
|||
|
ctx,
|
|||
|
dSlot,
|
|||
|
d,
|
|||
|
b, // parent
|
|||
|
graffiti,
|
|||
|
jEpoch,
|
|||
|
fEpoch,
|
|||
|
),
|
|||
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// D cannot win without a boost.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, c, r, "Expected C to remain the head")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Block D receives the boost.
|
|||
|
genesis = time.Now().Add(-3 * secondsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, dSlot /* slot */, d, genesis))
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Ensure D becomes the head thanks to boosting.
|
|||
|
r, err = f.Head(ctx, jEpoch, zeroHash, balances, fEpoch)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
assert.Equal(t, d, r, "Expected D to become the head")
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
func TestForkChoice_BoostProposerRoot(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
params.SetupTestConfigCleanup(t)
|
|||
|
cfg := params.BeaconConfig()
|
|||
|
cfg.SecondsPerSlot = 6
|
|||
|
cfg.IntervalsPerSlot = 3
|
|||
|
params.OverrideBeaconConfig(cfg)
|
|||
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
t.Run("does not boost block from different slot", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := &ForkChoice{
|
|||
|
store: &Store{},
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
// Genesis set to 1 slot ago.
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-time.Duration(cfg.SecondsPerSlot) * time.Second)
|
|||
|
blockRoot := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Trying to boost a block from slot 0 should not work.
|
|||
|
err := f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, types.Slot(0), blockRoot, genesis)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
require.DeepEqual(t, [32]byte{}, f.store.proposerBoostRoot)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("does not boost untimely block from same slot", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := &ForkChoice{
|
|||
|
store: &Store{},
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
// Genesis set to 1 slot ago + X where X > attesting interval.
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-time.Duration(cfg.SecondsPerSlot) * time.Second)
|
|||
|
attestingInterval := time.Duration(cfg.SecondsPerSlot / cfg.IntervalsPerSlot)
|
|||
|
greaterThanAttestingInterval := attestingInterval + 100*time.Millisecond
|
|||
|
genesis = genesis.Add(-greaterThanAttestingInterval * time.Second)
|
|||
|
blockRoot := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// Trying to boost a block from slot 1 that is untimely should not work.
|
|||
|
err := f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, types.Slot(1), blockRoot, genesis)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
require.DeepEqual(t, [32]byte{}, f.store.proposerBoostRoot)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("boosts perfectly timely block from same slot", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := &ForkChoice{
|
|||
|
store: &Store{},
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
// Genesis set to 1 slot ago + 0 seconds into the attesting interval.
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-time.Duration(cfg.SecondsPerSlot) * time.Second)
|
|||
|
fmt.Println(genesis)
|
|||
|
blockRoot := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
err := f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, types.Slot(1), blockRoot, genesis)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
require.DeepEqual(t, [32]byte{'A'}, f.store.proposerBoostRoot)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("boosts timely block from same slot", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
f := &ForkChoice{
|
|||
|
store: &Store{},
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
// Genesis set to 1 slot ago + (attesting interval / 2).
|
|||
|
genesis := time.Now().Add(-time.Duration(cfg.SecondsPerSlot) * time.Second)
|
|||
|
blockRoot := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|||
|
halfAttestingInterval := time.Second
|
|||
|
genesis = genesis.Add(-halfAttestingInterval)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
err := f.BoostProposerRoot(ctx, types.Slot(1), blockRoot, genesis)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
require.DeepEqual(t, [32]byte{'A'}, f.store.proposerBoostRoot)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
func TestForkChoice_computeProposerBoostScore(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
t.Run("nil justified balances throws error", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
_, err := computeProposerBoostScore(nil)
|
|||
|
require.ErrorContains(t, "no active validators", err)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
t.Run("normal active balances computes score", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
validatorBalances := make([]uint64, 64) // Num validators
|
|||
|
for i := 0; i < len(validatorBalances); i++ {
|
|||
|
validatorBalances[i] = 10
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
// Avg balance is 10, and the number of validators is 64.
|
|||
|
// With a committee size of num validators (64) / slots per epoch (32) == 2.
|
|||
|
// we then have a committee weight of avg balance * committee size = 10 * 2 = 20.
|
|||
|
// The score then becomes 10 * PROPOSER_SCORE_BOOST // 100, which is
|
|||
|
// 20 * 70 / 100 = 14.
|
|||
|
score, err := computeProposerBoostScore(validatorBalances)
|
|||
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|||
|
require.Equal(t, uint64(14), score)
|
|||
|
})
|
|||
|
}
|