> Copied from https://github.com/uudashr/gocognit/blob/5bf67146515e79acd2a8d5728deafa9d91ad48db/README.md > License: MIT [![GoDoc](https://godoc.org/github.com/uudashr/gocognit?status.svg)](https://godoc.org/github.com/uudashr/gocognit) # Gocognit Gocognit calculates cognitive complexities of functions in Go source code. A measurement of how hard does the code is intuitively to understand. ## Understanding the complexity Given code using `if` statement, ```go func GetWords(number int) string { if number == 1 { // +1 return "one" } else if number == 2 { // +1 return "a couple" } else if number == 3 { // +1 return "a few" } else { // +1 return "lots" } } // Cognitive complexity = 4 ``` Above code can be refactored using `switch` statement, ```go func GetWords(number int) string { switch number { // +1 case 1: return "one" case 2: return "a couple" case 3: return "a few" default: return "lots" } } // Cognitive complexity = 1 ``` As you see above codes are the same, but the second code are easier to understand, that is why the cognitive complexity score are lower compare to the first one. ## Comparison with cyclometic complexity ### Example 1 #### Cyclometic complexity ```go func GetWords(number int) string { // +1 switch number { case 1: // +1 return "one" case 2: // +1 return "a couple" case 3: // +1 return "a few" default: return "lots" } } // Cyclomatic complexity = 4 ``` #### Cognitive complexity ```go func GetWords(number int) string { switch number { // +1 case 1: return "one" case 2: return "a couple" case 3: return "a few" default: return "lots" } } // Cognitive complexity = 1 ``` Cognitive complexity give lower score compare to cyclomatic complexity. ### Example 2 #### Cyclomatic complexity ```go func SumOfPrimes(max int) int { // +1 var total int OUT: for i := 1; i < max; i++ { // +1 for j := 2; j < i; j++ { // +1 if i%j == 0 { // +1 continue OUT } } total += i } return total } // Cyclomatic complexity = 4 ``` #### Cognitive complexity ```go func SumOfPrimes(max int) int { var total int OUT: for i := 1; i < max; i++ { // +1 for j := 2; j < i; j++ { // +2 (nesting = 1) if i%j == 0 { // +3 (nesting = 2) continue OUT // +1 } } total += i } return total } // Cognitive complexity = 7 ``` Cognitive complexity give higher score compare to cyclomatic complexity. ## Rules The cognitive complexity of a function is calculated according to the following rules: > Note: these rules are specific for Go, please see the [original whitepaper](./CognitiveComplexity.pdf) for more complete reference. ### Increments There is an increment for each of the following: 1. `if`, `else if`, `else` 2. `switch`, `select` 3. `for` 4. `goto` LABEL, `break` LABEL, `continue` LABEL 5. sequence of binary logical operators 6. each method in a recursion cycle ### Nesting level The following structures increment the nesting level: 1. `if`, `else if`, `else` 2. `switch`, `select` 3. `for` 4. function literal or lambda ### Nesting increments The following structures receive a nesting increment commensurate with their nested depth inside nesting structures: 1. `if` 2. `switch`, `select` 3. `for` ## Installation ``` $ go install github.com/uudashr/gocognit/cmd/gocognit@latest ``` or ``` $ go get github.com/uudashr/gocognit/cmd/gocognit ``` ## Usage ``` $ gocognit Calculate cognitive complexities of Go functions. Usage: gocognit [flags] ... Flags: -over N show functions with complexity > N only and return exit code 1 if the set is non-empty -top N show the top N most complex functions only -avg show the average complexity over all functions, not depending on whether -over or -top are set The output fields for each line are: ``` Examples: ``` $ gocognit . $ gocognit main.go $ gocognit -top 10 src/ $ gocognit -over 25 docker $ gocognit -avg . ``` The output fields for each line are: ``` ``` ## Related project - [Gocyclo](https://github.com/fzipp/gocyclo) where the code are based on. - [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](./CognitiveComplexity.pdf) white paper by G. Ann Campbell.