prysm-pulse/beacon-chain/forkchoice/doubly-linked-tree/optimistic_sync_test.go
Potuz 57a323f083
Forkchoice featureflag (#10299)
* Compiling main beacon-chain binary

* Add feature flag

* passing protoarray tests

* passing nodetree tests

* passing blockchain package tests

* passing rpc tests

* go fmt

* re-export forkchoice store from blockchain package

* remove duplicated import

* remove unused var

* add nodetree rpc method

* remove slot from IsOptimisticForRoot

* release lock in IsOptimistic

* change package name

* Revert "change package name"

This reverts commit 679112f9ef795922c631e7823dbdfb3746838f3c.

* rename package

* Update doc

* Fix span names

* Terence + Raul review

* remove go:build flags

* add errors dep

* spec tests

* fix call to IsOptimisticForRoot

* fix test

* Fix conflict

* change name of function

* remove ctx from store.head

Co-authored-by: terence tsao <terence@prysmaticlabs.com>
2022-03-09 03:05:51 +00:00

71 lines
2.1 KiB
Go

package doublylinkedtree
import (
"context"
"testing"
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/config/params"
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/testing/require"
)
// We test the algorithm to update a node from SYNCING to INVALID
// We start with the same diagram as above:
//
// E -- F
// /
// C -- D
// / \
// A -- B G -- H -- I
// \ \
// J -- K -- L
//
// And every block in the Fork choice is optimistic.
//
func TestPruneInvalid(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
root [32]byte // the root of the new INVALID block
wantedNodeNumber int
}{
{
[32]byte{'j'},
12,
},
{
[32]byte{'c'},
4,
},
{
[32]byte{'i'},
12,
},
{
[32]byte{'h'},
11,
},
{
[32]byte{'g'},
8,
},
}
for _, tc := range tests {
ctx := context.Background()
f := setup(1, 1)
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 100, [32]byte{'a'}, params.BeaconConfig().ZeroHash, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 101, [32]byte{'b'}, [32]byte{'a'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 102, [32]byte{'c'}, [32]byte{'b'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 102, [32]byte{'j'}, [32]byte{'b'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 103, [32]byte{'d'}, [32]byte{'c'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 104, [32]byte{'e'}, [32]byte{'d'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 104, [32]byte{'g'}, [32]byte{'d'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'f'}, [32]byte{'e'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'h'}, [32]byte{'g'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'k'}, [32]byte{'g'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 106, [32]byte{'i'}, [32]byte{'h'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 106, [32]byte{'l'}, [32]byte{'k'}, 1, 1, true))
require.NoError(t, f.store.removeNode(context.Background(), tc.root))
require.Equal(t, tc.wantedNodeNumber, f.NodeCount())
}
}