mirror of
https://gitlab.com/pulsechaincom/prysm-pulse.git
synced 2024-12-25 04:47:18 +00:00
aeb6940935
* Prune synced tips * Terence's minor cleanups * Update optimistic_sync.go * go fmt Co-authored-by: terence tsao <terence@prysmaticlabs.com>
749 lines
27 KiB
Go
749 lines
27 KiB
Go
package protoarray
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
types "github.com/prysmaticlabs/eth2-types"
|
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/config/params"
|
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/encoding/bytesutil"
|
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/testing/assert"
|
|
"github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/testing/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_PruneThreshold(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
pruneThreshold: defaultPruneThreshold,
|
|
}
|
|
if got := s.PruneThreshold(); got != defaultPruneThreshold {
|
|
t.Errorf("PruneThreshold() = %v, want %v", got, defaultPruneThreshold)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_JustifiedEpoch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
j := types.Epoch(100)
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: j,
|
|
}
|
|
if got := s.JustifiedEpoch(); got != j {
|
|
t.Errorf("JustifiedEpoch() = %v, want %v", got, j)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_FinalizedEpoch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
f := types.Epoch(50)
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
finalizedEpoch: f,
|
|
}
|
|
if got := s.FinalizedEpoch(); got != f {
|
|
t.Errorf("FinalizedEpoch() = %v, want %v", got, f)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Nodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodes := []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 100},
|
|
{slot: 101},
|
|
}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
nodes: nodes,
|
|
}
|
|
require.DeepEqual(t, nodes, s.Nodes())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_NodesIndices(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodeIndices := map[[32]byte]uint64{
|
|
{'a'}: 1,
|
|
{'b'}: 2,
|
|
}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
nodesIndices: nodeIndices,
|
|
}
|
|
require.DeepEqual(t, nodeIndices, s.NodesIndices())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestForkChoice_HasNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodeIndices := map[[32]byte]uint64{
|
|
{'a'}: 1,
|
|
{'b'}: 2,
|
|
}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
nodesIndices: nodeIndices,
|
|
}
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: s}
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.HasNode([32]byte{'a'}))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestForkChoice_Store(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodeIndices := map[[32]byte]uint64{
|
|
{'a'}: 1,
|
|
{'b'}: 2,
|
|
}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
nodesIndices: nodeIndices,
|
|
}
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: s}
|
|
require.DeepEqual(t, s, f.Store())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestForkChoice_Nodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodes := []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 100},
|
|
{slot: 101},
|
|
}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
nodes: nodes,
|
|
}
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: s}
|
|
require.DeepEqual(t, s.nodes, f.Nodes())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Head_UnknownJustifiedRoot(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: make(map[[32]byte]uint64)}
|
|
|
|
_, err := s.head(context.Background(), [32]byte{})
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, errUnknownJustifiedRoot.Error(), err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Head_UnknownJustifiedIndex(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
indices[r] = 1
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: indices}
|
|
|
|
_, err := s.head(context.Background(), r)
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, errInvalidJustifiedIndex.Error(), err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Head_Itself(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
indices[r] = 0
|
|
|
|
// Since the justified node does not have a best descendant so the best node
|
|
// is itself.
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: indices, nodes: []*Node{{root: r, bestDescendant: NonExistentNode}}, canonicalNodes: make(map[[32]byte]bool)}
|
|
h, err := s.head(context.Background(), r)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, r, h)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Head_BestDescendant(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|
best := [32]byte{'B'}
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
indices[r] = 0
|
|
|
|
// Since the justified node's best descendent is at index 1 and it's root is `best`,
|
|
// the head should be `best`.
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: indices, nodes: []*Node{{root: r, bestDescendant: 1}, {root: best}}, canonicalNodes: make(map[[32]byte]bool)}
|
|
h, err := s.head(context.Background(), r)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, best, h)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Head_ContextCancelled(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
r := [32]byte{'A'}
|
|
best := [32]byte{'B'}
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
indices[r] = 0
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: indices, nodes: []*Node{{root: r, bestDescendant: 1}, {root: best}}, canonicalNodes: make(map[[32]byte]bool)}
|
|
cancel()
|
|
_, err := s.head(ctx, r)
|
|
require.ErrorContains(t, "context canceled", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Insert_UnknownParent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// The new node does not have a parent.
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: make(map[[32]byte]uint64)}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.insert(context.Background(), 100, [32]byte{'A'}, [32]byte{'B'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(s.nodes), "Did not insert block")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(s.nodesIndices), "Did not insert block")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, NonExistentNode, s.nodes[0].parent, "Incorrect parent")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.nodes[0].justifiedEpoch, "Incorrect justification")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.nodes[0].finalizedEpoch, "Incorrect finalization")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, [32]byte{'A'}, s.nodes[0].root, "Incorrect root")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Insert_KnownParent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Similar to UnknownParent test, but this time the new node has a valid parent already in store.
|
|
// The new node builds on top of the parent.
|
|
s := &Store{nodesIndices: make(map[[32]byte]uint64)}
|
|
s.nodes = []*Node{{}}
|
|
p := [32]byte{'B'}
|
|
s.nodesIndices[p] = 0
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.insert(context.Background(), 100, [32]byte{'A'}, p, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 2, len(s.nodes), "Did not insert block")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 2, len(s.nodesIndices), "Did not insert block")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(0), s.nodes[1].parent, "Incorrect parent")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.nodes[1].justifiedEpoch, "Incorrect justification")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.nodes[1].finalizedEpoch, "Incorrect finalization")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, [32]byte{'A'}, s.nodes[1].root, "Incorrect root")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ApplyScoreChanges_InvalidDeltaLength(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := &Store{}
|
|
|
|
// This will fail because node indices has length of 0, and delta list has a length of 1.
|
|
err := s.applyWeightChanges(context.Background(), 0, 0, []uint64{}, []int{1})
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, errInvalidDeltaLength.Error(), err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ApplyScoreChanges_UpdateEpochs(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := &Store{}
|
|
|
|
// The justified and finalized epochs in Store should be updated to 1 and 1 given the following input.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.applyWeightChanges(context.Background(), 1, 1, []uint64{}, []int{}))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.justifiedEpoch, "Did not update justified epoch")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, types.Epoch(1), s.finalizedEpoch, "Did not update finalized epoch")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ApplyScoreChanges_UpdateWeightsPositiveDelta(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Construct 3 nodes with weight 100 on each node. The 3 nodes linked to each other.
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: []*Node{
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{parent: 1, root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
// Each node gets one unique vote. The weight should look like 103 <- 102 <- 101 because
|
|
// they get propagated back.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.applyWeightChanges(context.Background(), 0, 0, []uint64{}, []int{1, 1, 1}))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(103), s.nodes[0].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(102), s.nodes[1].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(101), s.nodes[2].weight)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ApplyScoreChanges_UpdateWeightsNegativeDelta(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Construct 3 nodes with weight 100 on each node. The 3 nodes linked to each other.
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: []*Node{
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{parent: 1, root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
// Each node gets one unique vote which contributes to negative delta.
|
|
// The weight should look like 97 <- 98 <- 99 because they get propagated back.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.applyWeightChanges(context.Background(), 0, 0, []uint64{}, []int{-1, -1, -1}))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(97), s.nodes[0].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(98), s.nodes[1].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(99), s.nodes[2].weight)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ApplyScoreChanges_UpdateWeightsMixedDelta(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Construct 3 nodes with weight 100 on each node. The 3 nodes linked to each other.
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: []*Node{
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100},
|
|
{parent: 1, root: [32]byte{'A'}, weight: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
// Each node gets one mixed vote. The weight should look like 100 <- 200 <- 250.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.applyWeightChanges(context.Background(), 0, 0, []uint64{}, []int{-100, -50, 150}))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(100), s.nodes[0].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(200), s.nodes[1].weight)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(250), s.nodes[2].weight)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_RemoveChild(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child equal's to input child index and child is not viable.
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1}, {}}, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 1))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are `none`.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, NonExistentNode, s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, NonExistentNode, s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_UpdateDescendant(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child equal to child index and child is viable.
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1}, {bestDescendant: NonExistentNode}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 1))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child is the same and best descendant is not set to child index.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_ChangeChildByViability(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child not equal to child index, child leads to viable index and
|
|
// parents best child doesnt lead to viable index.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are set to child index.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_ChangeChildByWeight(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child not equal to child index, child leads to viable index and
|
|
// parents best child leads to viable index but child has more weight than parent's best child.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1, weight: 1}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are set to child index.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_ChangeChildAtLeaf(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child to none and input child leads to viable index.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are set to child index.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(2), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_NoChangeByViability(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child not equal to child index, child leads to not viable index and
|
|
// parents best child leads to viable index.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are not changed.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(0), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_NoChangeByWeight(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child not equal to child index, child leads to viable index and
|
|
// parents best child leads to viable index but parent's best child has more weight.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1, weight: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are not changed.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(0), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateBestChildAndDescendant_NoChangeAtLeaf(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Make parent's best child to none and input child does not lead to viable index.
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: 1,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: 1,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{{bestChild: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode, justifiedEpoch: 1, finalizedEpoch: 1},
|
|
{bestDescendant: NonExistentNode}}}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.updateBestChildAndDescendant(0, 2))
|
|
|
|
// Verify parent's best child and best descendant are not changed.
|
|
assert.Equal(t, NonExistentNode, s.nodes[0].bestChild, "Did not get correct best child index")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, uint64(0), s.nodes[0].bestDescendant, "Did not get correct best descendant index")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Prune_LessThanThreshold(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Define 100 nodes in store.
|
|
numOfNodes := 100
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
nodes := make([]*Node, 0)
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(0))] = uint64(0)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(0),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(0)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(1),
|
|
parent: NonExistentNode,
|
|
})
|
|
for i := 1; i < numOfNodes-1; i++ {
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(i))] = uint64(i)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(i),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(i)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(i + 1),
|
|
parent: uint64(i) - 1,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(numOfNodes-1))] = uint64(numOfNodes - 1)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(numOfNodes - 1)),
|
|
bestDescendant: NonExistentNode,
|
|
bestChild: NonExistentNode,
|
|
parent: uint64(numOfNodes - 2),
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: nodes, nodesIndices: indices, pruneThreshold: 100}
|
|
syncedTips := &optimisticStore{}
|
|
|
|
// Finalized root is at index 99 so everything before 99 should be pruned,
|
|
// but PruneThreshold is at 100 so nothing will be pruned.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.prune(context.Background(), indexToHash(99), syncedTips))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 100, len(s.nodes), "Incorrect nodes count")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 100, len(s.nodesIndices), "Incorrect node indices count")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Prune_MoreThanThreshold(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Define 100 nodes in store.
|
|
numOfNodes := 100
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
nodes := make([]*Node, 0)
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(0))] = uint64(0)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(0),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(0)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(1),
|
|
parent: NonExistentNode,
|
|
})
|
|
for i := 1; i < numOfNodes-1; i++ {
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(i))] = uint64(i)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(i),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(i)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(i + 1),
|
|
parent: uint64(i) - 1,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(numOfNodes - 1)),
|
|
bestDescendant: NonExistentNode,
|
|
bestChild: NonExistentNode,
|
|
parent: uint64(numOfNodes - 2),
|
|
})
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(numOfNodes-1))] = uint64(numOfNodes - 1)
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: nodes, nodesIndices: indices}
|
|
syncedTips := &optimisticStore{}
|
|
|
|
// Finalized root is at index 99 so everything before 99 should be pruned.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.prune(context.Background(), indexToHash(99), syncedTips))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(s.nodes), "Incorrect nodes count")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(s.nodesIndices), "Incorrect node indices count")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_Prune_MoreThanOnce(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Define 100 nodes in store.
|
|
numOfNodes := 100
|
|
indices := make(map[[32]byte]uint64)
|
|
nodes := make([]*Node, 0)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(0),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(0)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(1),
|
|
parent: NonExistentNode,
|
|
})
|
|
for i := 1; i < numOfNodes-1; i++ {
|
|
indices[indexToHash(uint64(i))] = uint64(i)
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(i),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(i)),
|
|
bestDescendant: uint64(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
bestChild: uint64(i + 1),
|
|
parent: uint64(i) - 1,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
nodes = append(nodes, &Node{
|
|
slot: types.Slot(numOfNodes - 1),
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(numOfNodes - 1)),
|
|
bestDescendant: NonExistentNode,
|
|
bestChild: NonExistentNode,
|
|
parent: uint64(numOfNodes - 2),
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
s := &Store{nodes: nodes, nodesIndices: indices}
|
|
syncedTips := &optimisticStore{}
|
|
|
|
// Finalized root is at index 11 so everything before 11 should be pruned.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.prune(context.Background(), indexToHash(10), syncedTips))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 90, len(s.nodes), "Incorrect nodes count")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 90, len(s.nodesIndices), "Incorrect node indices count")
|
|
|
|
// One more time.
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.prune(context.Background(), indexToHash(20), syncedTips))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 80, len(s.nodes), "Incorrect nodes count")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 80, len(s.nodesIndices), "Incorrect node indices count")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This unit tests starts with a simple branch like this
|
|
//
|
|
// - 1
|
|
// /
|
|
// -- 0 -- 2
|
|
//
|
|
// And we finalize 1. As a result only 1 should survive
|
|
func TestStore_Prune_NoDanglingBranch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
nodes := []*Node{
|
|
{
|
|
slot: 100,
|
|
bestChild: 1,
|
|
bestDescendant: 1,
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(0)),
|
|
parent: NonExistentNode,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
slot: 101,
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(1)),
|
|
bestChild: NonExistentNode,
|
|
bestDescendant: NonExistentNode,
|
|
parent: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
slot: 101,
|
|
root: indexToHash(uint64(2)),
|
|
parent: 0,
|
|
bestChild: NonExistentNode,
|
|
bestDescendant: NonExistentNode,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
syncedTips := &optimisticStore{}
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
pruneThreshold: 0,
|
|
nodes: nodes,
|
|
nodesIndices: map[[32]byte]uint64{
|
|
indexToHash(uint64(0)): 0,
|
|
indexToHash(uint64(1)): 1,
|
|
indexToHash(uint64(2)): 2,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
require.NoError(t, s.prune(context.Background(), indexToHash(uint64(1)), syncedTips))
|
|
require.Equal(t, len(s.nodes), 1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This test starts with the following branching diagram
|
|
/// We start with the following diagram
|
|
//
|
|
// E -- F
|
|
// /
|
|
// C -- D
|
|
// / \
|
|
// A -- B G -- H -- I
|
|
// \ \
|
|
// J -- K -- L
|
|
//
|
|
//
|
|
// Synced tips are B, D and E. And we finalize F. All that is left in fork
|
|
// choice is F, and the only synced tip left is E which is now away from Fork
|
|
// Choice.
|
|
func TestStore_PruneSyncedTips(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
f := setup(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 100, [32]byte{'a'}, params.BeaconConfig().ZeroHash, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 101, [32]byte{'b'}, [32]byte{'a'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 102, [32]byte{'c'}, [32]byte{'b'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 102, [32]byte{'j'}, [32]byte{'b'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 103, [32]byte{'d'}, [32]byte{'c'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 104, [32]byte{'e'}, [32]byte{'d'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 104, [32]byte{'g'}, [32]byte{'d'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'f'}, [32]byte{'e'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'h'}, [32]byte{'g'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 105, [32]byte{'k'}, [32]byte{'g'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 106, [32]byte{'i'}, [32]byte{'h'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.ProcessBlock(ctx, 106, [32]byte{'l'}, [32]byte{'k'}, [32]byte{}, 1, 1))
|
|
syncedTips := &optimisticStore{
|
|
validatedTips: map[[32]byte]types.Slot{
|
|
[32]byte{'b'}: 101,
|
|
[32]byte{'d'}: 103,
|
|
[32]byte{'e'}: 104,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
f.syncedTips = syncedTips
|
|
f.store.pruneThreshold = 0
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.Prune(ctx, [32]byte{'f'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, 1, len(f.syncedTips.validatedTips))
|
|
_, ok := f.syncedTips.validatedTips[[32]byte{'e'}]
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, ok)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_LeadsToViableHead(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
n *Node
|
|
justifiedEpoch types.Epoch
|
|
finalizedEpoch types.Epoch
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{&Node{}, 0, 0, true},
|
|
{&Node{}, 1, 0, false},
|
|
{&Node{}, 0, 1, false},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1}, 1, 1, true},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1}, 2, 2, false},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 3, justifiedEpoch: 4}, 4, 3, true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range tests {
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: tc.justifiedEpoch,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: tc.finalizedEpoch,
|
|
nodes: []*Node{tc.n},
|
|
}
|
|
got, err := s.leadsToViableHead(tc.n)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, tc.want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_ViableForHead(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
n *Node
|
|
justifiedEpoch types.Epoch
|
|
finalizedEpoch types.Epoch
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{&Node{}, 0, 0, true},
|
|
{&Node{}, 1, 0, false},
|
|
{&Node{}, 0, 1, false},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1}, 1, 1, true},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 1, justifiedEpoch: 1}, 2, 2, false},
|
|
{&Node{finalizedEpoch: 3, justifiedEpoch: 4}, 4, 3, true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range tests {
|
|
s := &Store{
|
|
justifiedEpoch: tc.justifiedEpoch,
|
|
finalizedEpoch: tc.finalizedEpoch,
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, tc.want, s.viableForHead(tc.n))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_HasParent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
m map[[32]byte]uint64
|
|
n []*Node
|
|
r [32]byte
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{r: [32]byte{'a'}, want: false},
|
|
{m: map[[32]byte]uint64{{'a'}: 0}, r: [32]byte{'a'}, want: false},
|
|
{m: map[[32]byte]uint64{{'a'}: 0}, r: [32]byte{'a'},
|
|
n: []*Node{{parent: NonExistentNode}}, want: false},
|
|
{m: map[[32]byte]uint64{{'a'}: 0},
|
|
n: []*Node{{parent: 0}}, r: [32]byte{'a'},
|
|
want: true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range tests {
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{
|
|
nodesIndices: tc.m,
|
|
nodes: tc.n,
|
|
}}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, tc.want, f.HasParent(tc.r))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_AncestorRoot(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{}}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices = map[[32]byte]uint64{}
|
|
_, err := f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'a'}, 0)
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, "node does not exist", err)
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'a'}] = 0
|
|
_, err = f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'a'}, 0)
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, "node index out of range", err)
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'b'}] = 1
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'c'}] = 2
|
|
f.store.nodes = []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 1, root: [32]byte{'a'}, parent: NonExistentNode},
|
|
{slot: 2, root: [32]byte{'b'}, parent: 0},
|
|
{slot: 3, root: [32]byte{'c'}, parent: 1},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r, err := f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}, 1)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, bytesutil.ToBytes32(r), [32]byte{'a'})
|
|
r, err = f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}, 2)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, bytesutil.ToBytes32(r), [32]byte{'b'})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_AncestorRootOutOfBound(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{}}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices = map[[32]byte]uint64{}
|
|
_, err := f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'a'}, 0)
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, "node does not exist", err)
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'a'}] = 0
|
|
_, err = f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'a'}, 0)
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, "node index out of range", err)
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'b'}] = 1
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'c'}] = 2
|
|
f.store.nodes = []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 1, root: [32]byte{'a'}, parent: NonExistentNode},
|
|
{slot: 2, root: [32]byte{'b'}, parent: 100}, // Out of bound parent.
|
|
{slot: 3, root: [32]byte{'c'}, parent: 1},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, err = f.AncestorRoot(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}, 1)
|
|
require.ErrorContains(t, "node index out of range", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateCanonicalNodes_WholeList(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{}}
|
|
f.store.canonicalNodes = map[[32]byte]bool{}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices = map[[32]byte]uint64{}
|
|
f.store.nodes = []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 1, root: [32]byte{'a'}, parent: NonExistentNode},
|
|
{slot: 2, root: [32]byte{'b'}, parent: 0},
|
|
{slot: 3, root: [32]byte{'c'}, parent: 1},
|
|
}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'c'}] = 2
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.store.updateCanonicalNodes(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, len(f.store.nodes), len(f.store.canonicalNodes))
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.IsCanonical([32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.IsCanonical([32]byte{'b'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.IsCanonical([32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
require.DeepEqual(t, f.Node([32]byte{'c'}), f.store.nodes[2])
|
|
require.Equal(t, f.Node([32]byte{'d'}), (*Node)(nil))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateCanonicalNodes_ParentAlreadyIn(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{}}
|
|
f.store.canonicalNodes = map[[32]byte]bool{}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices = map[[32]byte]uint64{}
|
|
f.store.nodes = []*Node{
|
|
{},
|
|
{slot: 2, root: [32]byte{'b'}, parent: 0},
|
|
{slot: 3, root: [32]byte{'c'}, parent: 1},
|
|
}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'c'}] = 2
|
|
f.store.canonicalNodes[[32]byte{'b'}] = true
|
|
require.NoError(t, f.store.updateCanonicalNodes(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, len(f.store.nodes)-1, len(f.store.canonicalNodes))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.IsCanonical([32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
require.Equal(t, true, f.IsCanonical([32]byte{'b'}))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStore_UpdateCanonicalNodes_ContextCancelled(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
f := &ForkChoice{store: &Store{}}
|
|
f.store.canonicalNodes = map[[32]byte]bool{}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices = map[[32]byte]uint64{}
|
|
f.store.nodes = []*Node{
|
|
{slot: 1, root: [32]byte{'a'}, parent: NonExistentNode},
|
|
{slot: 2, root: [32]byte{'b'}, parent: 0},
|
|
{slot: 3, root: [32]byte{'c'}, parent: 1},
|
|
}
|
|
f.store.nodesIndices[[32]byte{'c'}] = 2
|
|
cancel()
|
|
require.ErrorContains(t, "context canceled", f.store.updateCanonicalNodes(ctx, [32]byte{'c'}))
|
|
}
|